Leadership Responsibility in Preventing Workplace Harassment

Compliance under the POSH Act extends beyond HR departments. Leadership bears cultural and governance responsibility. Tone from the top significantly influences reporting behavior and employee confidence.

Senior management must actively endorse policy, participate in awareness programs, and avoid informal interference in inquiries. Passive endorsement is insufficient; visible accountability matters.

Boards must review annual POSH reports and monitor systemic risks. In multinational and GCC structures, alignment with global harassment standards is critical.

Leadership silence often signals tolerance. Conversely, proactive messaging builds trust and deterrence.

Prevention is ultimately a leadership function, not merely a legal requirement

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Because the PoSH Committee released the respondents following an investigation under the PoSH Act, the FIR against them was dropped.

Image
Posh Act 2013 A recent FIR brought against two MNC employees that had already been cleared of all allegations by the PoSH Committee was dismissed by the Delhi High Court. An intern had allegedly been sexually harassed by the two workers. The PoSH Committee cleared the responders, nonetheless, after finishing the investigation. The legal issue that the Court was trying to resolve is a key part of this ruling: Can the FIR against the accused still stand if the PoSH Committee clears them of all charges? The Court noted that: The Committee was established as soon as the FIR was filed and the inquiry proceedings were held, 2. The Complainant informed the PoSH Committee shortly after that she did not wish to pursue her complaint, and 3, despite the Complainant failing to appear for cross-examination, the Committee continued the proceedings. 4. The PoSH Act, 2013, provisions were properly followed throughout the inquiry process, and  5. The committee issued the Final Report based on the m...
Read more

Top Sexual Harassment Lawyers in India

The POSH ( Prevention of Sexual Harassment ) Act 2013 and the existing sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) dealing with sexual harassment serve different purposes and have different legal frameworks. Here's a comparative overview of the two: 1. Purpose and Scope: • POSH Act 2013:  This Act is specifically designed to address and prevent sexual harassment at workplaces. It defines sexual harassment, mandates the establishment of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) in organizations, and provides a structured process for filing and resolving complaints within the workplace. • IPC Sections on Sexual Harassment:  The IPC contains various sections that deal with sexual offenses, but they are not specific to workplace harassment. These sections cover a wider range of sexual offenses, including rape (Section 375), outraging the modesty of a woman (Section 354), and others. These sections are applicable in general, non-workplace settings. 2. Applicability: • POSH Act 20...
Read more

Kerala High Court Clarifies Written Complaint Requirement Under POSH Act in Abraham Mathai v. State of Kerala

In an important ruling aimed at safeguarding procedural fairness under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Kerala High Court, in the case of Abraham Mathai v. State of Kerala & Ors., has categorically held that a written complaint from the aggrieved woman is a mandatory prerequisite for initiating any inquiry by the Internal Committee (IC). The judgment sets clear boundaries on the initiation of proceedings, preventing misuse and ensuring due process. The case arose when an individual challenged the initiation of a POSH inquiry that was based on an oral complain t and anonymous allegations rather than a formal written complaint as stipulated under Section 9 of the Act. The petitioner contended that the Internal Committee had overstepped its jurisdiction by entertaining allegations that were not formally registered in writing, thereby violating the basic procedural safeguards built into the statute. The Ker...
Read more