Posh Law - The Role of Conciliation in POSH Investigations

Not every case of sexual harassment at the workplace needs to culminate in a formal inquiry. The POSH Act, 2013 recognizes that in some situations, the aggrieved woman may prefer a less adversarial resolution. This is where conciliation plays a role offering an opportunity to resolve the complaint amicably, provided certain safeguards are respected. For the Internal Committee (IC), conciliation is a delicate process that requires sensitivity, neutrality, and strict adherence to law.

1. When Conciliation Can Be Considered

  • Conciliation is an option available only at the request of the complainant.
  • The IC cannot suggest or impose conciliation on its own.
  • The request must be made before the start of the formal inquiry process.

This ensures that the complainant’s autonomy and comfort remain at the center of decision-making.

2. Prohibited Basis of Conciliation

The law expressly forbids monetary settlement as the foundation of conciliation. This is a critical safeguard against misuse and exploitation. Instead, conciliation can be based on:

  • An apology or written undertaking from the respondent.
  • Mutual agreement on behavior changes.
  • Undertakings to avoid contact, maintain professional boundaries, or ensure a safe work environment.
  • Other non-monetary resolutions acceptable to the complainant.

3. The IC’s Role in Conciliation

The Internal Committee must ensure that conciliation is conducted with fairness and transparency. Its responsibilities include:

  • Facilitating the discussion while maintaining neutrality.
  • Recording the terms of settlement in writing, ensuring clarity and enforceability.
  • Sharing a copy of the settlement with both parties and the employer.
  • Ensuring closure of the case once both sides confirm compliance.

Importantly, the IC must document the process in its records, since conciliation is considered a valid closure under the Act.

4. Benefits and Risks of Conciliation

Benefits:

  • Provides a quicker, less confrontational resolution.
  • Reduces emotional distress for both parties.
  • Preserves workplace relationships when both parties are willing.

Risks:

  • May be perceived as downplaying the seriousness of harassment if not handled carefully.
  • Could leave the complainant feeling pressured if IC neutrality is not maintained.
  • If terms are vague or unenforceable, disputes may resurface later.

Thus, conciliation must always be voluntary, well-documented, and respectful of the complainant’s dignity.

5. Why Step 4 Matters

Conciliation represents a unique balancing act between justice and resolution. Its importance lies in:

  • Respecting choice: The complainant drives the decision, not the IC or employer.
  • Preventing escalation: It allows workplace issues to be resolved constructively.
  • Upholding compliance: When properly documented, it provides a lawful closure to the case.
  • Building trust: Demonstrates that the organization offers multiple pathways for redressal.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Because the PoSH Committee released the respondents following an investigation under the PoSH Act, the FIR against them was dropped.

Image
Posh Act 2013 A recent FIR brought against two MNC employees that had already been cleared of all allegations by the PoSH Committee was dismissed by the Delhi High Court. An intern had allegedly been sexually harassed by the two workers. The PoSH Committee cleared the responders, nonetheless, after finishing the investigation. The legal issue that the Court was trying to resolve is a key part of this ruling: Can the FIR against the accused still stand if the PoSH Committee clears them of all charges? The Court noted that: The Committee was established as soon as the FIR was filed and the inquiry proceedings were held, 2. The Complainant informed the PoSH Committee shortly after that she did not wish to pursue her complaint, and 3, despite the Complainant failing to appear for cross-examination, the Committee continued the proceedings. 4. The PoSH Act, 2013, provisions were properly followed throughout the inquiry process, and  5. The committee issued the Final Report based on the m...
Read more

Kerala High Court Clarifies Written Complaint Requirement Under POSH Act in Abraham Mathai v. State of Kerala

In an important ruling aimed at safeguarding procedural fairness under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 ( POSH Act ), the Kerala High Court, in the case of Abraham Mathai v. State of Kerala & Ors., has categorically held that a written complaint from the aggrieved woman is a mandatory prerequisite for initiating any inquiry by the Internal Committee (IC). The judgment sets clear boundaries on the initiation of proceedings, preventing misuse and ensuring due process. The case arose when an individual challenged the initiation of a POSH inquiry that was based on an oral complain t and anonymous allegations rather than a formal written complaint as stipulated under Section 9 of the Act. The petitioner contended that the Internal Committee had overstepped its jurisdiction by entertaining allegations that were not formally registered in writing, thereby violating the basic procedural safeguards built into the statute. The Ker...
Read more

Extended Workplace’ under POSH Law

Image
Posh Act 2013 One of the most obnoxious issues we now confront is sexual harassment. More than 9 years have passed since our legislature created the POSH Act in an effort to enhance it and close any gaps in the Vishaka Guidelines. Our courts had emphasised the significance of expanding the definition of "workplace" even before the POSH Act of 2013 was passed. For instance, the Calcutta High Court stated that "a logical interpretation should be given to the phrase 'workplace' so that the objective for which those rules have been created, is not made unworkable" in Ayesha Khatun v. The State of West Bengal & Others (MANU/WB/0071/2012). ‘Workplace’ – How is it defined under Section 2(o) of POSH Law? The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) has given a wide definition to the term ‘workplace’ under Section 2(o) of the Act and included the concept of ‘extended workplace’ in its definition. Under t...
Read more